Priorities are disconnected
Scans, audits, and risk registers identify issues, but rarely show which ones threaten delivery, product integrity, revenue, or recovery.
CAST maps business-critical operations, exposes the shared dependencies behind them, and shows leadership which cyber risks deserve action first.
Built for aerospace suppliers, advanced manufacturers, robotics firms, industrial technology, connected-product companies, and other engineering-driven organizations.

CAST connects cyber conditions to operational disruption so leadership can make informed decisions about what to protect, fund, and fix.
Scans, audits, and risk registers identify issues, but rarely show which ones threaten delivery, product integrity, revenue, or recovery.
Critical outcomes cross engineering, IT, operations, suppliers, cloud services, identities, and specialized technology.
Executives and technical owners need one evidence-based view of operational consequence and accountable action.
Every Critical Operations Cyber Review is conducted through the CAST BCCM Analysis System.
The structured model connects critical operations, dependencies, threat paths, evidence, assumptions, confidence, risk priorities, and accountable actions. It maintains a traceable line from business consequence to technical action.
Define the operations and business outcomes the company must preserve.
Connect the people, technology, data, vendors, access paths, and recovery capabilities behind them.
Trace credible cyber disruption paths through shared dependencies and operational chokepoints.
Rank risk by business consequence, supporting evidence, and confidence.
Give leadership clear decisions, accountable owners, and a sequenced 90-day plan.
One connected package gives executives the business context and technical owners the detail required to act.
The outcomes the company must preserve, the relationships between them, and the shared dependencies supporting them.
Credible disruption paths tied to evidence, confidence, affected operations, and material business consequences.
A prioritized risk register, executive summary, accountable owners, and sequenced 90-day action plan.
A fictional example is available for executives and prospective partners who want to evaluate the structure and depth of a CAST engagement. It demonstrates how the BCCM Analysis System turns operational evidence into decision-ready outputs.
Request the Worked ExampleFounder Hayden Tracy brings 7+ years across cybersecurity engineering, threat analysis, mission assurance, and operational dependency analysis.
CAST translates that experience into a commercial methodology focused on operational resilience and executive decisions. The experience below was performed as an employee under other organizations before establishing CAST.
Connected cybersecurity requirements, implementation evidence, verification, mitigation, and residual-risk decisions.
Mapped dependencies, key cyber terrain, trust relationships, vulnerabilities, and operational chokepoints for priority space systems.
Analyzed 240+ CVEs and planned cyber hunt operations that identified 12 previously undocumented vulnerabilities.
The initial discussion clarifies those outcomes, the unanswered risk questions, the available evidence, and the analysis depth required to produce useful guidance.
Begin the Strategic Discussion